More consoles, not more picture
Each new sensor adds another screen, another login and one more place to miss the contact that matters.
Tiktaalik AI builds the decision layer for counter-drone operations. It brings the sensors a site already runs into one current picture, supports the operator's judgement, and keeps a record of every decision. Operators stay in command; AI is optional.
First conversation, no deck required. Sensitive material moves to a secure channel.
Each new sensor adds another screen, another login and one more place to miss the contact that matters.
When three radars see one drone, the operator sees three contacts. Birds and false detections add more.
After an incident, the team must show what was seen, how fresh it was, which rule applied and who had authority. A log of the last action cannot answer that.


Observations arrive from different sensors at different times. Duplicate reports converge on one object, and the track shows which sensors contributed.
These are the outcomes a site gets. Together they give the operator one picture to act on.
A live view of the airspace that shows how recent each contribution is, so stale data looks stale instead of current.
02Duplicate reports from different sensors become a single track, with the sensors behind it visible.
03Each track gets a class and a confidence level: drone, vehicle, bird or false detection. The platform says when it is unsure.
04Short-term behaviour and an urgency estimate help an operator judge which contact matters first.
05A digital twin of the site calculates what a sensor set can see and lets a team rehearse layouts before buying hardware.
06Recommendations arrive with their evidence and alternatives, labelled as advice rather than as an instruction.
A command passes only when four independent checks all say yes. Each answers a different question, and each can stop the command.
Any check can stop a command. When the conditions cannot be confirmed, the platform refuses and records the refusal.
No obligation. A human reply, not a sequence.
Observation, belief, judgement, advice, command and outcome are different statements. Keeping them apart is what makes a decision reviewable.
A recommendation is never a command. Completed means the equipment reported completion; it does not mean the effect occurred.
What a sensor reported.
The current picture of one object, including how fresh it is.
A judgement about class, behaviour or urgency, with a confidence level.
Advice to a person: what, why, the evidence and the alternatives. Never a command.
An action authorized by a person after all four checks.
What happened, and separately what was observed to happen.

Model the site before hardware is bought, so sensor placement is based on evidence rather than opinion.
Model the site and calculate what a sensor layout can see before any hardware is bought or moved.
The same layout gives the same result, so options can be compared fairly.
The twin can suggest adding, removing or replacing sensors. A person accepts or rejects it, and the decision is recorded.
Planning only. Nothing changes until a person accepts a proposal.
A test environment lets a team exercise a deployment before it is connected to live sensors.
A test site accepts synthetic sensor traffic, so the team can practise without touching live data.
The screen shows TEST, never LIVE, and simulated data cannot enter the live picture.
Results are checked against known truth: correct merges, missed objects and wrong classes.
Rehearsal is kept separate from live operations.
The platform fits the setup a site already has, from a single site to a group of sites that share a picture.
A complete local picture for a site that does not run a command-and-control system.
Adds the decision layer beneath the command-and-control system a site already operates. That system keeps authority.
Deployment is adapted to the site's network and hardware, and is designed to run without a cloud connection.
The platform is software. It is delivered as a package an installation team can run in the field.
Installer, integration support and updates for the site's environment.
Hands-on training for the team that installs and supports the system in the field.
Remote support inside the customer's security rules.
Tiktaalik AI supplies the software and training; installation and hardware integration sit with the installing partner.

No. The platform runs standalone or alongside the command-and-control system you already operate. In an integrated deployment it adds tracking, fusion, classification and decision support to the data that system already receives.
The platform is designed to connect to the sensors and systems a site already operates. Every integration is scoped with the customer.
In control. By default a person authorizes any action before it is sent. A customer can define where automation is allowed, within its rules, and every change is recorded.
No. AI is optional and the platform keeps working without it. When AI is used, it runs on the customer's infrastructure rather than a cloud service.
Each site keeps working locally. Remote data is marked as stale, and actions that cannot be confirmed are refused and recorded.
Start with a conversation about the site and the decisions it needs to support. A first deployment can be small, and capability can grow as the need is proven.
Describe the sensors you run, the system you answer to, and the decisions you need to support. We will reply with a scoped next step.
Discuss your requirementsNo obligation. The first conversation is just a conversation.